Relative risk, Risk difference and Odds ratio
When the data to be analyzed consist of counts in a cross-classification of two groups (or conditions) and two outcomes, the data can be represented in a fourfold table as follows:
Group 1 | Group 2 | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
Number with positive outcome | a | c | a+c |
Number with negative outcome | b | d | b+d |
Total | a+b | c+d | a+b+c+d |
Several statistics can be calculated such as relative risk and risk difference, relevant in prospective studies, and odds ratio, relevant in retrospective case controls studies.
How to calculate Relative Risk
The relative risk (RR), its standard error and 95% confidence interval are calculated as follows (Altman, 1991).
The relative risk or risk ratio is given by
with the standard error of the log relative risk being
and 95% confidence interval
Risk difference
The risk difference (RD) and its 95% confidence interval are calculated according to Newcombe & Altman (2000)
The recommended method for the calculation of the risk difference, which is a difference between proportions, requires the calculation of the confidence intervals of the two proportions separately. MedCalc calculates exact binomial confidence intervals for proportions (Armitage et al., 2002). With l1 to u1 being the 95% CI of the first proportion p1 and l2 to u2 being the 95% CI of the second proportion p2, the 95% confidence interval for the difference is given by
In the context of meta-analysis, the standard error and 95% confidence interval are calculated according to Deeks & Higgins (2010), where the standard error is defined as
and 95% confidence interval
How to calculate Odds Ratio
The odds ratio (OR), its standard error and 95% confidence interval are calculated as follows (Altman, 1991).
The formula for odds ratio is:
with the standard error of the log odds ratio being
and 95% confidence interval
Notes
Where zeros cause problems with computation of effects or standard errors, 0.5 is added to all cells (a, b, c, d) (Pagano & Gauvreau, 2000; Deeks & Higgins, 2010).
In meta-analysis for relative risk and odds ratio, studies where a=c=0 or b=d=0 are excluded from the analysis (Higgins & Thomas, 2021).
Literature
- Altman DG (1991) Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall.
- Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS (2002) Statistical methods in medical research. 4th ed. Blackwell Science.
- Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT (2010) Statistical algorithms in Review Manager 5. Retrieved from https://training.cochrane.org/
- Higgins JPT, Thomas J (editors) (2021) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2021. Available from https://training.cochrane.org
- Newcombe RG, Altman DG (2000) Proportions and their differences. In: Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TN, Gardner MJ (Eds) Statistics with confidence, 2nd ed. BMJ Books, 2000.
- Pagano M, Gauvreau K (2000) Principles of biostatistics. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.